Sunday, December 22, 2024
Subscribe American Journal of Medicine Free Newsletter
health careMedicareSite of Treatment for Non-Urgent Conditions by Medicare Beneficiaries: Is There a...

Site of Treatment for Non-Urgent Conditions by Medicare Beneficiaries: Is There a Role for Urgent Care Centers?

gr1

 

There is limited information on where and how often Medicare beneficiaries seek care for non-urgent conditions when a physician office visit is not available. Emergency departments are often an alternative site of care, and urgent care centers have now also emerged to fill this need. The purpose of the study was to characterize the site of care for Medicare beneficiaries with non-urgent conditions; the relationship between physician office, urgent care center, and emergency department utilization; and specifically the role of urgent care centers.

Methods

The study is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries for fiscal year 2012. The main outcome was rate and geographic variation of urgent care center, emergency department, or physician office utilization.

Results

Care for non-urgent conditions most commonly occurred in physician offices (65.0 per 100 beneficiaries). In contrast, urgent care centers (6.0 per 100 beneficiaries) were a more common site of care than emergency departments (1.0 per 100 beneficiaries). Overall, 83% of non-urgent visits were physician offices, 14% urgent care centers, and 3% emergency departments. There was regional variation in urgent care center, emergency department, and physician office utilization for non-urgent conditions. Areas of higher emergency department utilization correspond to areas of lower urgent care center and physician office utilization, whereas areas of higher urgent care center utilization had lower emergency department utilization.

Conclusions

Urgent care centers are an important site of care for Medicare beneficiaries for non-urgent conditions. There is regional variation in the use of urgent care centers, emergency departments, and physician offices, with areas of low urgent care center utilization having higher emergency department utilization. The utilization of urgent care centers for treatment for non-urgent conditions may decrease emergency department utilization.

In the US health care system, gaps exist in the ability of individuals to access the primary care system in a timely and cost-effective manner, particularly for non-urgent conditions (ie, a condition that is not life-threatening or likely to result in hospitalization).1 Often individuals either do not have a primary care physician or have trouble scheduling a timely appointment with a primary care physician.2 As a result, many choose to seek care in emergency departments for non-urgent conditions not requiring emergency care.3 However, the cost of providing care for non-urgent conditions in the emergency department is significantly higher than the cost of providing care in other clinical settings.4, 5 If individuals with non-urgent conditions could be shifted to settings other than the emergency department, it is estimated $4.4 billion in costs to the health care system could be saved.3 Therefore, providing alternative care locations to emergency departments for individuals with non-urgent illnesses has both cost and quality of care implications.

Since 1980, and particularly over the last 15 years, urgent care centers have emerged to fill the need for non-urgent acute care.6 Broadly defined, urgent care centers provide services in episodic ambulatory care on a walk-in basis, including off-hours availability.6, 7 There are now almost 9000 urgent care centers across the country.6Urgent care centers have more than 70 million patient care visits per year.6 Urgent care centers have been shown to provide care for non-urgent conditions equivalent in quality to that provided in the emergency department, at a lower cost.5 Urgent care center use has also been shown to decrease emergency department visits, decreasing the frequency of emergency department visits up to 48% in the 6 months following an initial urgent care center visit.8

Medicare beneficiaries account for at least 15% of total emergency department visits and utilize the emergency department at rates twice that of individuals with private insurance.4, 9 Medicare beneficiaries more often seek ambulatory medical care and thus could represent a population that would benefit from easier access to care and lower health care costs if non-urgent emergency department visits could be shifted.5, 10 However, it is not clear that emergency department visits by Medicare beneficiaries are as common for non-urgent conditions as for the general population.11 In addition, although it has been demonstrated that Medicare beneficiaries have high emergency department utilization rates, no data are currently available regarding urgent care center utilization for Medicare beneficiaries.2, 9, 12 The lack of urgent care center utilization data for Medicare beneficiaries represents a gap in our understanding of how Medicare beneficiaries meet their acute health care needs for non-urgent conditions. Therefore, it is important to understand where Medicare beneficiaries obtain care for non-urgent conditions, how they are currently utilizing urgent care centers, and the relationship of urgent care center utilization by Medicare beneficiaries to their overall use of the emergency department and physician office for non-urgent conditions. This information is important in understanding how urgent care centers may merge with other components of the health care system for Medicare beneficiaries. We examined the utilization of urgent care centers, emergency departments, and physician offices by Medicare beneficiaries with predefined non-urgent conditions.

 

To read this article in its entirety please visit our website.

-Gregory S. Corwin, MPH, Devin M. Parker, MS, Jeremiah R. Brown, PhD

This article originally appeared in the September 2016 issue of The American Journal of Medicine.

Latest Posts

lupus

Sarcoidosis with Lupus Pernio in an Afro-Caribbean Man

A 54-year-old man of Afro-Caribbean ancestry presented with a 2-month history of nonproductive cough, 10-day history of constant subjective fevers, and a 1-day history...
Flue Vaccine

Flu Vaccination to Prevent Cardiovascular Mortality (video)

0
"Influenza can cause a significant burden on patients with coronary artery disease," write Barbetta et al in The American Journal of Medicine. For this...
varicella zoster

Varicella Zoster Virus-Induced Complete Heart Block

0
Complete heart block is usually caused by chronic myocardial ischemia and fibrosis but can also be induced by bacterial and viral infections. The varicella...
Racial justice in healthcare

Teaching Anti-Racism in the Clinical Environment

0
"Teaching Anti-Racism in the Clinical Environment: The Five-Minute Moment for Racial Justice in Healthcare" was originally published in the April 2023 issue of The...
Invisible hand of the market

The ‘Invisible Hand’ Doesn’t Work for Prescription Drugs

0
Pharmaceutical innovation has been responsible for many “miracles of modern medicine.” Reliance on the “invisible hand” of Adam Smith to allocate resources in the...
Joseph S. Alpert, MD

New Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors

0
"New Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors" by AJM Editor-in Chief Joseph S. Alpert, MD was originally published in the April 2023 issue of The...
Cardiovascular risk from noncardiac activities

Cardiac Risk Related to Noncardiac & Nonsurgical Activities

0
"Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk for Noncardiac and Nonsurgical Activities" was originally published in the April 2023 issue of The American Journal of Medicine. Cardiovascular risk...