Tuesday, November 5, 2024
Subscribe American Journal of Medicine Free Newsletter
diagnostic testsOver-testing: Why More Is Not Better

Over-testing: Why More Is Not Better

fainting-hivOver-testing is at the root of many of our problems. Ordering, reviewing, and interpreting tests, explaining results, and follow-up testing consume valuable time. When a test isn’t necessary, time can be more appropriately spent counseling patients, listening to them, and redoubling efforts to follow well-supported preventive guidelines.

Over-testing may be defined as the use of: 1) nonrecommended screening tests in asymptomatic patients, or 2) more testing than necessary to diagnose patients with signs or symptoms. This discussion explores reasons physicians over-test, problems that ensue, and describes viable solutions for practitioners and primary care and specialty societies. Discussion is confined to the outpatient setting to simplify this analysis.

There are at least 5 reasons why clinicians over-test:

1)Belief that ordering many tests will help detect subclinical disease
2)Defensive medicine
3)Lack of knowledge or confidence
4)Patients’ expectations
5)Profit

When ordering unproven screening tests for asymptomatic patients without good reason, few consider the low yield, high cost per diagnosis made, and considerable toll of false positives. Anecdotal accounts of unexpected diagnoses discovered on “routine” testing help perpetuate over-testing. But even the best tests yield more false positives than true positives when the prevalence of what one is testing for is low. Others order tests to establish a “baseline,” but this has been shown repeatedly not to improve care for asymptomatic patients and consumes hundreds of millions of health care dollars per year.1, 2 Abnormal results that later prove erroneous engender unnecessary anxiety and needless follow-up testing. Ordering only medically indicated tests reduces our role as instigators of needless worry and, as an added benefit, helps lessen physicians’ workload.

To read this article in its entirety and to view additional images please visit our website.

–Jerome Greenberg, MD, Jonas B. Green, MD, MPH, MSHS

This article originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of The American Journal of Medicine.

Latest Posts

lupus

Sarcoidosis with Lupus Pernio in an Afro-Caribbean Man

A 54-year-old man of Afro-Caribbean ancestry presented with a 2-month history of nonproductive cough, 10-day history of constant subjective fevers, and a 1-day history...
Flue Vaccine

Flu Vaccination to Prevent Cardiovascular Mortality (video)

0
"Influenza can cause a significant burden on patients with coronary artery disease," write Barbetta et al in The American Journal of Medicine. For this...
varicella zoster

Varicella Zoster Virus-Induced Complete Heart Block

0
Complete heart block is usually caused by chronic myocardial ischemia and fibrosis but can also be induced by bacterial and viral infections. The varicella...
Racial justice in healthcare

Teaching Anti-Racism in the Clinical Environment

0
"Teaching Anti-Racism in the Clinical Environment: The Five-Minute Moment for Racial Justice in Healthcare" was originally published in the April 2023 issue of The...
Invisible hand of the market

The ‘Invisible Hand’ Doesn’t Work for Prescription Drugs

0
Pharmaceutical innovation has been responsible for many “miracles of modern medicine.” Reliance on the “invisible hand” of Adam Smith to allocate resources in the...
Joseph S. Alpert, MD

New Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors

0
"New Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors" by AJM Editor-in Chief Joseph S. Alpert, MD was originally published in the April 2023 issue of The...
Cardiovascular risk from noncardiac activities

Cardiac Risk Related to Noncardiac & Nonsurgical Activities

0
"Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk for Noncardiac and Nonsurgical Activities" was originally published in the April 2023 issue of The American Journal of Medicine. Cardiovascular risk...